PROPOSAL FOR THE GRADING COMMITTEE-FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES

PROPOSAL FOR THE GRADING COMMITTEE - FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES

Please, see Faculty's and University's instructions on the grading committee members: https://www.helsinki.fi/en/faculty-of-social-sciences/guidelines-for-the-examination-of-doctoral-dissertations

By filling out this form coordinating academic (professor or docent) makes a proposal for the grading committee members.

Members of the committee include the custos, the opponent(s) and one or two faculty representatives (depending on whether the Custos is the supervisor and hence not able to vote at the committee meeting), who are proposed by the coordinating academic. The opponents must be professors or docents, or doctoral degree holders with equivalent academic qualifications. The faculty representative must be a professor or a member of the research and teaching staff who has the qualifications of a docent.

You may continue submitting the information later by filling in the details under Partial submission.

After you have filled in the form, print out a paper copy: under Proceed, from the drop-down menu Print and/or save your data choose proposalforgradingcommitteevalt.rtf.

To add attachments, choose I want to send an attachment / attachments. You can also send the appendices to doctoral study services by e-mail.

Once you click Submit at the end of the form, you may print out the form.

Print out a paper copy and send it signed to PhD study services: valt-postgrad@helsinki.fi

Data balance sheet

DOCTORAL CANDIDATE

Last name

First name

Degree

Student number

E-mail address

Major subject

Doctoral programme

Title of the doctoral dissertation (same than in e-thesis)

Proposal for the Members of the Grading Committee

Preliminary examiners, Opponents, and Faculty representatives of the Grading committee cannot have any relationship with the doctoral candidate, the dissertation or another party that can compromise their impartiality. Consequently, following persons cannot be chosen:
- A person who has co-authored at least one of the articles in the dissertation
- A person who is currently engaged in the research co-operation with the doctoral candidate or who was engaged in research co-operation during the dissertation project.
- A person who has been engaged in close research cooperation with the dissertation supervisor durint the three years prior to the pre-examination
- A close relative of the doctoral candidate
- The immediate superior or sub-ordinate of the doctoral candidate or supervisor
- A member of the doctoral dissertation monitoring group

OPPONENT

Last name

First name

Title/position

Affiliation (institution/university)

E-mail

Address

The proposed opponent does not have a title of professor or docent

Opponent_cv

If the proposed opponent does not have a title of professor or docent, please provide reasons for the Faculty Council why and how this person is equivalento to a docent as well as enclose the CV and list of publications.

Grounds for the proposal if necessary:

CUSTOS

Last name

First name

Title/position

E-mail

FACULTY REPRESENTATIVE 1

Last name

First name

Title/position

Affiliation (department/unit)

E-mail

FACULTY REPRESENTATIVE 2

Last name

First name

Title/position

Affiliation (department/unit)

E-mail

Signatures - by signing the document we assure that the recommendations made by the pre-examiners have been taken into consideration.

Coordinating Academic

Doctoral Candidate

Partial submission

I wish to save the form and continue using the link that will be sent into email I give

Email address

Proceed

NB! Print out a paper copy: from the drop-down menu choose proposalforgradingcommitteevalt.rtf.